
E-300

Ryzen 5 5600X
E-300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
E-300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
E-300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
E-300
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $239 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6310, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,176 vs 21,845).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +618.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 272.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β398.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- β261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while E-300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than E-300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E-300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E-300
The E-300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,176 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The E-300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E-300 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X β a 111.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X. The E-300 uses the Zacate (2011β2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the E-300 scores 1,176 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 β a 179.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-300 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | E-300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+254% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 40 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-83% |
| Architecture | Zacate (2011β2013) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 1,176 | 21,845+1758% |
Memory & Platform
The E-300 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the E-300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X β the Ryzen 5 5600X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (E-300) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 0 (E-300) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) β the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | E-300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The E-300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6310), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: E-300 targets Budget Mobile, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | E-300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6310 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Mobile | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the E-300 was priced at $60, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($60 vs $299), E-300 was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E-300 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X β making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 115.4% better value option.
| Feature | E-300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-80% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 73.1+273% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














