E-300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

E-300

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

E-300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

E-300

2 / 2

1,176

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

+1807.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E-300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E-300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E-300

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6310, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,176 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +765.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 247.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
448.3% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while E-300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than E-300?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 765.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1807.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 765.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1807.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 448.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 765.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 247.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 19.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E-300 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E-300

The E-300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,176 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The E-300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E-300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 108.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The E-300 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the E-300 scores 1,176 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 180.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-300 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	E-300	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+238%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	40 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-83%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,176	22,430+1807%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-300 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the E-300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (E-300) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (E-300) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	E-300	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FT1	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (E-300) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The E-300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6310), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: E-300 targets Budget Mobile.

Feature	E-300	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6310	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the E-300 was priced at $60, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($60 vs $329), E-300 was $269 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E-300 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 110.7% better value option.

Feature	E-300	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$60-82%	$329
Performance per Dollar	19.6	68.2+248%
Release Date	2011	2019

Search E-300 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.