E-450
VS
Athlon II X2 240

E-450 vs Athlon II X2 240

AMD

E-450

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.65 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 240

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-450 is positioned at rank 849 and the Athlon II X2 240 is on rank 852, so the E-450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-450

#837
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1380%
#838
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1360%
#839
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1248%
#840
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1243%
#841
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1231%
#843
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1189%
#844
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1140%
#845
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1138%
#846
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1108%
#849
E-450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17641%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16669%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12103%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3646%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2527%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1447%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1300%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1300%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1286%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1251%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1234%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1229%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1217%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
99%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
98%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
98%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
98%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
98%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
96%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
96%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X2 240 leads in gaming performance. However, the E-450 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE-450Athlon II X2 240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE-450Athlon II X2 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-450 and Athlon II X2 240

AMD

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon II X2 240

The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.

Processing Power

Both the E-450 and Athlon II X2 240 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.65 GHz on the E-450 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240 — a 51.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240. The E-450 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E-450 scores 1,063 against the Athlon II X2 240's 1,060 — a 0.3% lead for the E-450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE-450Athlon II X2 240
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.65 GHz
2.8 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
40 nm-11%
45 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,063
1,060
Geekbench 6 Single
373
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-450 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-450Athlon II X2 240
Socket
FT1
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-450) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400.

FeatureE-450Athlon II X2 240
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop