E-450
VS
Celeron N2820

E-450 vs Celeron N2820

AMD

E-450

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.65 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron N2820

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.39 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-450 is positioned at rank 849 and the Celeron N2820 is on rank 259, so the Celeron N2820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-450

#837
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1380%
#838
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1360%
#839
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1248%
#840
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1243%
#841
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1231%
#843
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1189%
#844
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1140%
#845
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1138%
#846
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1108%
#849
E-450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2820

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#247
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
415%
#248
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
409%
#249
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
375%
#250
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#251
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
370%
#253
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
357%
#254
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#255
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
342%
#256
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
333%
#259
Celeron N2820
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2820 leads in gaming performance. However, the E-450 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE-450Celeron N2820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE-450Celeron N2820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-450 and Celeron N2820

AMD

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2820

The Celeron N2820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,061 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the E-450 and Celeron N2820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.65 GHz on the E-450 versus 2.39 GHz on the Celeron N2820 — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Celeron N2820. The E-450 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Celeron N2820 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E-450 scores 1,063 against the Celeron N2820's 1,061 — a 0.2% lead for the E-450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE-450Celeron N2820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.65 GHz
2.39 GHz+45%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm
22 nm-45%
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,063
1,061
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-450 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2820 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-450Celeron N2820
Socket
FT1
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-450) / VT-x (Celeron N2820). The Celeron N2820 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the E-450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2820 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2820 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureE-450Celeron N2820
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Netbook