E1-2500 vs Pentium 3558U

E1-2500 vs Pentium 3558U Performance Spectrum

E1-2500

2 / 2

1,052

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 3558U

2 / 2

1,041

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-2500 vs Pentium 3558U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-2500 vs Pentium 3558U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-2500

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3558U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,041 vs 1,052).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-2500 better than Pentium 3558U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 3558U is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-2500 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-2500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-2500 still makes the most sense overall. E1-2500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3558U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E1-2500 vs Pentium 3558U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-2500

The E1-2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,052 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-2500 and Pentium 3558U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1-2500 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Pentium 3558U. The E1-2500 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-2500 scores 1,052 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 1.1% lead for the E1-2500. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-2500 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

Feature	E1-2500	Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.7 GHz+21%
Base Clock	—	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,052+1%	1,041

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-2500 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.