E2-3000M vs Pentium 4415Y

E2-3000M vs Pentium 4415Y Performance Spectrum

E2-3000M

2 / 2

1,597

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 4415Y

2 / 4

1,582

0.0%

Pentium D 940

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Pentium Dual Core T4300

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3000M vs Pentium 4415Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3000M vs Pentium 4415Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3000M

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Pentium 4415Y

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,582 vs 1,597).

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3000M better than Pentium 4415Y?

Yes. E2-3000M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-3000M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3000M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3000M still makes the most sense overall. E2-3000M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 4415Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-3000M vs Pentium 4415Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3000M

The E2-3000M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium 4415Y

The Pentium 4415Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB SmartCache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-3000M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium 4415Y's 2 cores. The E2-3000M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 4415Y uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (14 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3000M scores 1,597 against the Pentium 4415Y's 1,582 — a 0.9% lead for the E2-3000M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-3000M vs 2 MB SmartCache on the Pentium 4415Y.

Feature	E2-3000M	Pentium 4415Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+12%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB SmartCache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,597	1,582

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3000M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 4415Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.