Celeron G1820T vs E2-3000M

Celeron G1820T vs E2-3000M Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1820T

2 / 2

1,599

+0.1%

1,597

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820T vs E2-3000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820T vs E2-3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while E2-3000M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

E2-3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,597 vs 1,599).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820T better than E2-3000M?

Yes. Celeron G1820T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820T still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1820T vs E2-3000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

E2-3000M

The E2-3000M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820T and E2-3000M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 2.4 GHz on the E2-3000M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-3000M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the E2-3000M's 1,597 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1820T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T vs 0 kB on the E2-3000M.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	E2-3000M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+33%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,599	1,597
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-3000M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	E2-3000M
Socket	LGA1150	FS1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (E2-3000M). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the E2-3000M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.