Celeron G1820T vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820T vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820T vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,599 vs 1,615).
❌92.9% higher power demand at 54W vs 28W.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 54W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 better than Celeron G1820T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820T is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 still makes the most sense overall. VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820T vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 1% lead for the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+63%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+100%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	22 nm-45%	40 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,599	1,615+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Socket	LGA1150	NanoBGA2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (VIA Nano QuadCore L4700). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.