Celeron G1820T
VS
Phenom X4 9600

Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600

Intel

Celeron G1820T

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Phenom X4 9600

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1820T is positioned at rank 500 and the Phenom X4 9600 is on rank 397, so the Phenom X4 9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7797%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5349%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1611%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1276%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1117%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
640%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
631%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
575%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
575%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
568%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
553%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
545%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
543%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
538%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
98%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
98%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
96%
#500
Celeron G1820T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
97%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5819%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5498%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3992%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1203%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
953%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
833%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
477%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
471%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
429%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
429%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
424%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
413%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
407%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
405%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
402%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
97%
#397
Phenom X4 9600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1820T (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1820TPhenom X4 9600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9600 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1820TPhenom X4 9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1820T and Phenom X4 9600

Intel

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

AMD

Phenom X4 9600

The Phenom X4 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,607 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9600 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820T. The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9600 uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the Phenom X4 9600's 1,607 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom X4 9600. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600.

FeatureCeleron G1820TPhenom X4 9600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,599
1,607
Geekbench 6 Single
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9600 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1820TPhenom X4 9600
Socket
LGA1150
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (Phenom X4 9600). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom X4 9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.

FeatureCeleron G1820TPhenom X4 9600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget