Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600

Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1820T

2 / 2

1,599

0.0%

1,607

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Phenom X4 9600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,599 vs 1,607).

Phenom X4 9600

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820T better than Phenom X4 9600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820T is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9600 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Celeron G1820T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820T still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820T vs Phenom X4 9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom X4 9600

The Phenom X4 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,607 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9600 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820T. The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9600 uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the Phenom X4 9600's 1,607 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom X4 9600. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	Phenom X4 9600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,599	1,607
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9600 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	Phenom X4 9600
Socket	LGA1150	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (Phenom X4 9600). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom X4 9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.