
E2-3000M

Pentium Dual Core T2370
E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
E2-3000M
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,597 vs 1,601).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Pentium Dual Core T2370
2008Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while E2-3000M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium Dual Core T2370 better than E2-3000M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3000M
The E2-3000M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium Dual Core T2370
The Pentium Dual Core T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,601 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the E2-3000M and Pentium Dual Core T2370 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3000M versus 1.73 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 — a 32.4% clock advantage for the E2-3000M. The E2-3000M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3000M scores 1,597 against the Pentium Dual Core T2370's 1,601 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T2370.
| Feature | E2-3000M | Pentium Dual Core T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+39% | 1.73 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,597 | 1,601 |
Memory & Platform
The E2-3000M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E2-3000M | Pentium Dual Core T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (E2-3000M) / No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T2370). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T2370 targets Mobile.
| Feature | E2-3000M | Pentium Dual Core T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















