E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370

AMD

E2-3000M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3000M

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,597 vs 1,601).
    • 3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

    Pentium Dual Core T2370

    2008

    Why buy it

    • +0.3% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while E2-3000M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium Dual Core T2370 better than E2-3000M?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-3000M is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T2370 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T2370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium Dual Core T2370 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core T2370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that E2-3000M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E2-3000M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    E2-3000M vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    E2-3000M

    The E2-3000M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $50.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual Core T2370

    The Pentium Dual Core T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,601 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the E2-3000M and Pentium Dual Core T2370 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3000M versus 1.73 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 — a 32.4% clock advantage for the E2-3000M. The E2-3000M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3000M scores 1,597 against the Pentium Dual Core T2370's 1,601 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T2370.

    FeatureE2-3000MPentium Dual Core T2370
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz+39%
    1.73 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)+51100%
    1 MB
    Process
    32 nm-51%
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Llano (2011−2012)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,597
    1,601
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The E2-3000M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureE2-3000MPentium Dual Core T2370
    Socket
    FS1
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (E2-3000M) / No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T2370). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T2370 targets Mobile.

    FeatureE2-3000MPentium Dual Core T2370
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    No VT-x
    Target Use
    Mobile