Core i5-3339Y vs E2-3000M

Core i5-3339Y vs E2-3000M Performance Spectrum

Core i5-3339Y

2 / 4

1,589

0.0%

1,597

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3339Y vs E2-3000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3339Y vs E2-3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3339Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while E2-3000M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,589 vs 1,597).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

E2-3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3339Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3000M better than Core i5-3339Y?

Yes. E2-3000M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-3000M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3000M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3000M still makes the most sense overall. E2-3000M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3339Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3339Y vs E2-3000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3339Y

The Core i5-3339Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,589 points. Launch price was $250.

E2-3000M

The E2-3000M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3339Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E2-3000M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-3339Y versus 2.4 GHz on the E2-3000M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the E2-3000M (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-3339Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-3000M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3339Y scores 1,589 against the E2-3000M's 1,597 — a 0.5% lead for the E2-3000M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3339Y vs 0 kB on the E2-3000M.

Feature	Core i5-3339Y	E2-3000M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	1.8 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,589	1,597
Geekbench 6 Single	368	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3339Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-3000M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3339Y	E2-3000M
Socket	BGA1023	FS1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-3339Y) / not specified (E2-3000M). The Core i5-3339Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the E2-3000M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3339Y rivals AMD A8-4555M.