Core i5-3339Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

Core i5-3339Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-3339Y

2 / 4

1,589

+0.3%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

2 / 2

1,585

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3339Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3339Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3339Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,585 vs 1,589).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3339Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3339Y better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3339Y pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3339Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3339Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3339Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3339Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3339Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3339Y

The Core i5-3339Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,589 points. Launch price was $250.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3339Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-3339Y versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 — a 14% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. The Core i5-3339Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3339Y scores 1,589 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85's 1,585 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-3339Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3339Y vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85.

Feature	Core i5-3339Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,589	1,585
Geekbench 6 Single	368	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3339Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3339Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Socket	BGA1023	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-3339Y) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85). The Core i5-3339Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-3339Y rivals AMD A8-4555M.