E2-3200 vs Pentium 3558U

E2-3200 vs Pentium 3558U Performance Spectrum

E2-3200

2 / 2

1,050

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 3558U

2 / 2

1,041

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3200 vs Pentium 3558U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3200 vs Pentium 3558U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3200

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3558U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,041 vs 1,050).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3200 better than Pentium 3558U?

Yes. E2-3200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-3200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3200 still makes the most sense overall. E2-3200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3558U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-3200 vs Pentium 3558U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E2-3200 and Pentium 3558U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 34.1% clock advantage for the E2-3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The E2-3200 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 0.9% lead for the E2-3200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-3200 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

Feature	E2-3200	Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+41%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+41%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,050	1,041

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.