E2-3200
Xeon 5110
E2-3200 vs Xeon 5110 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
E2-3200 vs Xeon 5110 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
E2-3200 vs Xeon 5110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
E2-3200
2011Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,055).
Xeon 5110
2006Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 5110 better than E2-3200?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E2-3200 vs Xeon 5110 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
E2-3200
The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.
Xeon 5110
The Xeon 5110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $20.
Processing Power
Both the E2-3200 and Xeon 5110 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon 5110 — a 40% clock advantage for the E2-3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The E2-3200 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon 5110 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Xeon 5110's 1,055 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon 5110. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | E2-3200 | Xeon 5110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+50% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+50% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Woodcrest (2006) |
| PassMark | 1,050 | 1,055 |
Memory & Platform
The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5110 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E2-3200 | Xeon 5110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on E2-3200 and Xeon 5110
