E2-3200 vs Pentium T4200

E2-3200 vs Pentium T4200 Performance Spectrum

E2-3200

2 / 2

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T4200

1,055

+0.5%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3200 vs Pentium T4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3200 vs Pentium T4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3200

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,055).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium T4200

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while E2-3200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T4200 better than E2-3200?

Yes. Pentium T4200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium T4200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T4200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium T4200 is the better buy right now. Pentium T4200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-3200 vs Pentium T4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium T4200

The Pentium T4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-3200 is built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Pentium T4200's 1,055 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium T4200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-3200 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4200.

Feature	E2-3200	Pentium T4200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	—
PassMark	1,050	1,055

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.