E2-3200 vs Pentium N3510

E2-3200 vs Pentium N3510 Performance Spectrum

E2-3200

2 / 2

1,050

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium N3510

4 / 4

1,040

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3200 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3200 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3200

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,040 vs 1,050).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while E2-3200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3200 better than Pentium N3510?

Yes. E2-3200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-3200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3200 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. E2-3200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium N3510 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 1.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-3200 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-3200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3510 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the E2-3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The E2-3200 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3200 scores 1,050 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 1% lead for the E2-3200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-3200 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	E2-3200	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,050	1,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3200 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3510 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.