E2-6110
VS
Athlon 64 TF-20

E2-6110 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

AMD

E2-6110

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-6110 is positioned at rank 864 and the Athlon 64 TF-20 is on rank 790, so the Athlon 64 TF-20 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-6110

#852
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1426%
#853
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1405%
#854
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1290%
#855
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1284%
#856
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#858
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1229%
#859
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1178%
#860
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1176%
#861
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#864
E2-6110
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 TF-20

#778
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1178%
#779
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1161%
#780
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1066%
#781
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1061%
#782
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1051%
#784
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1015%
#785
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
973%
#786
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
972%
#787
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
946%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
99%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#800
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
97%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 TF-20 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-6110 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE2-6110Athlon 64 TF-20
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sherman (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-6110Athlon 64 TF-20
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-6110 and Athlon 64 TF-20

AMD

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Athlon 64 TF-20

The Athlon 64 TF-20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Sherman (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,245 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The E2-6110 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 TF-20 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E2-6110 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E2-6110 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 TF-20 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 TF-20. The E2-6110 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 TF-20 uses Sherman (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-6110 scores 1,234 against the Athlon 64 TF-20's 1,245 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon 64 TF-20.

FeatureE2-6110Athlon 64 TF-20
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz+7%
L2 Cache
2048 kB+300%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Sherman (2009)
PassMark
1,234
1,245
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-6110 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 TF-20 uses S1g1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-6110Athlon 64 TF-20
Socket
FT3
S1g1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-6110) / false (Athlon 64 TF-20).

FeatureE2-6110Athlon 64 TF-20
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false