E2-6110 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

E2-6110 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Performance Spectrum

E2-6110

4 / 4

1,234

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 / 2

1,232

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-6110 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-6110 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-6110

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,232 vs 1,234).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while E2-6110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-6110 better than Pentium Dual Core T4300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual Core T4300 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-6110 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-6110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-6110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-6110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Pentium Dual Core T4300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-6110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-6110 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-6110 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-6110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E2-6110 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T4300. The E2-6110 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-6110 scores 1,234 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 — a 0.2% lead for the E2-6110.

Feature	E2-6110	Pentium Dual Core T4300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.1 GHz+40%
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,234	1,232

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-6110 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E2-6110	Pentium Dual Core T4300
Socket	FT3	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-6110) / No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile.