Celeron 2950M
VS
E2-6110

Celeron 2950M vs E2-6110

Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E2-6110

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2950M is positioned at rank 545 and the E2-6110 is on rank 864, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-6110

#852
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1426%
#853
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1405%
#854
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1290%
#855
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1284%
#856
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#858
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1229%
#859
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1178%
#860
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1176%
#861
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#864
E2-6110
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 2950M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-6110 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 2950ME2-6110
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2950ME2-6110
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2950M and E2-6110

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Celeron 2950M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-6110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-6110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M versus 1.5 GHz on the E2-6110 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2950M. The Celeron 2950M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-6110 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2950M scores 1,238 against the E2-6110's 1,234 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 2950M.

FeatureCeleron 2950ME2-6110
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz+33%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,238
1,234
Geekbench 6 Single
352
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2950M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-6110 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2950ME2-6110
Socket
PGA946
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2950M) / not specified (E2-6110). The Celeron 2950M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the E2-6110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2950M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCeleron 2950ME2-6110
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget