Celeron 2950M vs Turion II Neo K625

Celeron 2950M vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2950M

2 / 2

1,238

0.0%

1,241

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2950M vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2950M vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2950M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Turion II Neo K625 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,238 vs 1,241).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2950M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Neo K625 better than Celeron 2950M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 2950M is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Neo K625 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Neo K625 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Neo K625 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II Neo K625 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2950M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2950M vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2950M and Turion II Neo K625 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2950M. The Celeron 2950M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2950M scores 1,238 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion II Neo K625.

Feature	Celeron 2950M	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+33%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,238	1,241
Geekbench 6 Single	352	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2950M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2950M	Turion II Neo K625
Socket	PGA946	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2950M) / not specified (Turion II Neo K625). The Celeron 2950M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Turion II Neo K625 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2950M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.