Celeron 2950M
VS
Xeon 5140

Celeron 2950M vs Xeon 5140

Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon 5140

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2950M is positioned at rank 545 and the Xeon 5140 is on rank 961, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5140

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
33628%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6349%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5641%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4358%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
99%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
98%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
98%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
97%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
92%
#961
Xeon 5140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
98%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
98%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
98%
#969
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
94%
#970
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
94%
#972
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
94%
#973
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
94%
#974
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
93%
#976
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 2950M (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 2950MXeon 5140
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon 5140 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 2950MXeon 5140
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2950M and Xeon 5140

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Xeon 5140

The Xeon 5140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $15.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2950M and Xeon 5140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5140 — a 15.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 5140 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Celeron 2950M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon 5140 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2950M scores 1,238 against the Xeon 5140's 1,235 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 2950M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2950M vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5140.

FeatureCeleron 2950MXeon 5140
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.33 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.33 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark
1,238
1,235
Geekbench 6 Single
352
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2950M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5140 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2950MXeon 5140
Socket
PGA946
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2950M) / not specified (Xeon 5140). The Celeron 2950M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Xeon 5140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2950M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCeleron 2950MXeon 5140
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget