E2-6110
VS
Core i3-3217U

E2-6110 vs Core i3-3217U

AMD

E2-6110

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-3217U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-6110 is positioned at rank 864 and the Core i3-3217U is on rank 684, so the Core i3-3217U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-6110

#852
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1426%
#853
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1405%
#854
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1290%
#855
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1284%
#856
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1273%
#858
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1229%
#859
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1178%
#860
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1176%
#861
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1145%
#864
E2-6110
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
98%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3217U

#672
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
957%
#673
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
943%
#674
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
866%
#675
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
862%
#676
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
854%
#678
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
825%
#679
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
791%
#680
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
790%
#681
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
768%
#684
Core i3-3217U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#695
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
98%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-3217U leads in gaming performance. However, the E2-6110 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE2-6110Core i3-3217U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-6110Core i3-3217U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-6110 and Core i3-3217U

AMD

E2-6110

The E2-6110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,234 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-3217U

The Core i3-3217U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,226 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The E2-6110 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3217U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the E2-6110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E2-6110 versus 1.8 GHz on the Core i3-3217U — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3217U. The E2-6110 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-3217U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E2-6110 scores 1,234 against the Core i3-3217U's 1,226 — a 0.7% lead for the E2-6110.

FeatureE2-6110Core i3-3217U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,234
1,226
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-6110 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3217U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-6110Core i3-3217U
Socket
FT3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-6110) / true (Core i3-3217U). The Core i3-3217U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the E2-6110 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3217U rivals AMD A6-4455M.

FeatureE2-6110Core i3-3217U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true