EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2752TER

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2752TER Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7252

8 / 16

19,411

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-2752TER

12 / 24

19,074

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2752TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2752TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7252

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌55.8% higher power demand at 120W vs 77W.

Xeon D-2752TER

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 77W instead of 120W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7252 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,074 vs 19,411).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7252 better than Xeon D-2752TER?

Yes. EPYC 7252 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7252 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7252 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7252 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7252 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2752TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2752TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Xeon D-2752TER

The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2752TER offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER — a 13.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 7252 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Xeon D-2752TER's 19,074 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER.

Feature	EPYC 7252	Xeon D-2752TER
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+60%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	19,411+2%	19,074

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.