EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351P

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,871).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 7351P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 better than EPYC 7351P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7351P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the better buy right now. Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7351P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7351P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 — a 51.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7351P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351P scores 24,871 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's 24,613 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7351P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.

Feature	EPYC 7351P	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4.9 GHz+69%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	24,871+1%	24,613

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.