EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌933.3% higher power demand at 155W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 155W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,668 vs 24,871).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z1 Extreme better than EPYC 7351P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7351P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Z1 Extreme still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Z1 Extreme comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Z1 Extreme makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7351P vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme

The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,668 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme — a 55% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7351P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351P scores 24,871 against the Ryzen Z1 Extreme's 24,668 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7351P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351P vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

Feature	EPYC 7351P	Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+76%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	24,871	24,668

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.