EPYC 7443 vs EPYC 7552

EPYC 7443 vs EPYC 7552 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7443

24 / 48

56,743

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7443 vs EPYC 7552 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7443 vs EPYC 7552: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7443

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,015 less on MSRP ($2,010 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (56,743 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 192 MB).

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7443 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 28.2 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7443 better than EPYC 7552?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7443 is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7552 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7443 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7443 comes in $2,015 cheaper on MSRP at $2,010 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7552 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 97.9% better value on MSRP (28.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7443 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7443 vs EPYC 7552 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7443

The EPYC 7443 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,743 points. Launch price was $2,010.

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7443 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7552 offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443 versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7443 (base: 2.85 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7443 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7552 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7443 scores 56,743 against the EPYC 7552's 57,414 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443 vs 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552.

Feature	EPYC 7443	EPYC 7552
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	48 / 96+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+21%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.85 GHz+30%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	192 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	56,743	57,414+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7443) and SP3 (EPYC 7552).

Feature	EPYC 7443	EPYC 7552
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7443 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 7443	EPYC 7552
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7443 was priced at $2010, while the EPYC 7552 came in at $4025. On launch pricing ($2010 vs $4025), EPYC 7443 was $2015 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7443 delivers 28.2 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7552 — making the EPYC 7443 the 65.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7443	EPYC 7552
MSRP	$2010-50%	$4025
Performance per Dollar	28.2+97%	14.3
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 7443 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7552 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.