
EPYC 7401

EPYC 7443
EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 7443 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 7443 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 7443: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $510 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- β Delivers 30.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 28.2 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- β Draws 155W instead of 200W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7443 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (55,280 vs 56,743).
EPYC 7443
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 28.2 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β29% higher power demand at 200W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7443 better than EPYC 7401?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 7443 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017β2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.

EPYC 7443
The EPYC 7443 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021β2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,743 points. Launch price was $2,010.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7443 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443 β a 28.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7443 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.85 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017β2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7443 uses Milan (2021β2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the EPYC 7443's 56,743 β a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 7443. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | EPYC 7443 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.85 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm+-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017β2018) | Milan (2021β2023) |
| PassMark | 55,280 | 56,743+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7443 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7443 β the EPYC 7443 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7443 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and SP3 (EPYC 7443).
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | EPYC 7443 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | 3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; EPYC 7443 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | EPYC 7443 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7401 was priced at $1500, while the EPYC 7443 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1500 vs $2010), EPYC 7401 was $510 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 28.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7443 β making the EPYC 7401 the 26.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | EPYC 7443 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500-25% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9+31% | 28.2 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















