EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 8324P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7401

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 8324P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401

24 / 48

55,280

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

+3.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 8324P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 8324P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $395 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (55,280 vs 57,127).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324P better than EPYC 7401?

Yes. EPYC 8324P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8324P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 64 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7401 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 8324P comes in 26.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,895 MSRP versus $1,500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7401 is also 22.2% better value on MSRP (36.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of TR4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7401 vs EPYC 8324P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401

The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 8324P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.65 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 8324P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the EPYC 8324P's 57,127 — a 3.3% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P.

Feature	EPYC 7401	EPYC 8324P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.65 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	55,280	57,127+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8324P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8324P — the EPYC 8324P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7401 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1152 — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7401) vs 6 (EPYC 8324P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 96 (EPYC 8324P) — the EPYC 7401 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and SP6 (EPYC 8324P).

Feature	EPYC 7401	EPYC 8324P
Socket	TR4	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	2048+78%	1152
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 7401	EPYC 8324P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7401 was priced at $1500, while the EPYC 8324P came in at $1895. On launch pricing ($1500 vs $1895), EPYC 7401 was $395 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8324P — making the EPYC 7401 the 20% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7401	EPYC 8324P
MSRP	$1500-21%	$1895
Performance per Dollar	36.9+23%	30.1
Release Date	2017	2023

Search EPYC 7401 on Amazon

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.