Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8362

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7401

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

32 Cores64 Thrd265 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401
24 / 48
55,280
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 2970WX
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen 7 8840HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Xeon Platinum 8362
32 / 64
56,787
+2.7%
brand logoXeon W-3235
brand logoCore i7-14700T
brand logoCore i5-13600K
brand logoCore i7-13790F
brand logoCore Ultra 7 255HX
brand logoXeon w7-3565X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X
brand logoXeon w9-3595X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7401
low187 FPS
medium165 FPS
high132 FPS
ultra105 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low193 FPS
medium155 FPS
high126 FPS
ultra98 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7401
low207 FPS
medium188 FPS
high160 FPS
ultra131 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low416 FPS
medium364 FPS
high297 FPS
ultra237 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7401
low620 FPS
medium518 FPS
high466 FPS
ultra399 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low986 FPS
medium859 FPS
high812 FPS
ultra720 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7401
low834 FPS
medium758 FPS
high651 FPS
ultra561 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low928 FPS
medium843 FPS
high728 FPS
ultra629 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7401
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7401
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra286 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra286 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7401
low291 FPS
medium221 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra182 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low323 FPS
medium244 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra189 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7401
low293 FPS
medium260 FPS
high204 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low259 FPS
medium228 FPS
high179 FPS
ultra143 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7401
low300 FPS
medium261 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra194 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low309 FPS
medium273 FPS
high251 FPS
ultra201 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7401
low230 FPS
medium203 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra159 FPS
1080P
Xeon Platinum 8362
low230 FPS
medium211 FPS
high179 FPS
ultra165 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8362: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
  • ✅Costs $4,736 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 304.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 155W instead of 265W, a 110W reduction.
  • ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8362 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (55,280 vs 56,787).
  • ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8362

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($6,236 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
  • ❌71% higher power demand at 265W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8362 better than EPYC 7401?
Yes. Xeon Platinum 8362 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8362 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8362 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8362 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7401 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8362 comes in 315.7% more expensive on MSRP at $6,236 MSRP versus $1,500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7401 is also 304.7% better value on MSRP (36.9 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8362 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7401

The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

The Xeon Platinum 8362 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 265 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,787 points. Launch price was $3,500.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8362 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8362 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8362 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8362 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8362 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the Xeon Platinum 8362's 56,787 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8362. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureEPYC 7401Xeon Platinum 8362
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+33%
48 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
55,280
56,787+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8362 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8362 — the Xeon Platinum 8362 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8362 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8362) — the EPYC 7401 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8362).

FeatureEPYC 7401Xeon Platinum 8362
Socket
TR4
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
2666
3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity
2048
4096+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8362 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; Xeon Platinum 8362 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureEPYC 7401Xeon Platinum 8362
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7401 was priced at $1500, while the Xeon Platinum 8362 came in at $6236. On launch pricing ($1500 vs $6236), EPYC 7401 was $4736 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8362 — making the EPYC 7401 the 120.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7401Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP
$1500-76%
$6236
Performance per Dollar
36.9+305%
9.1
Release Date
2017
2021
Search EPYC 7401 on AmazonSearch Xeon Platinum 8362 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.