EPYC 7401
Xeon w7-3455
EPYC 7401 vs Xeon w7-3455 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7401 vs Xeon w7-3455 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7401 vs Xeon w7-3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $989 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 270W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w7-3455
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,925 vs 55,280).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ❌74.2% higher power demand at 270W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7401 better than Xeon w7-3455?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7401 vs Xeon w7-3455 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.
Xeon w7-3455
The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7401 and Xeon w7-3455 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3455 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7401. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 67.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 55,280 | 54,925 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 — the Xeon w7-3455 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the EPYC 7401 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | DDR5-4800+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3455 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3455 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7401) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7401 was priced at $1500, while the Xeon w7-3455 came in at $2489. On launch pricing ($1500 vs $2489), EPYC 7401 was $989 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the EPYC 7401 the 50.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500-40% | $2489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9+67% | 22.1 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7401 and Xeon w7-3455
