EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Platinum 8362

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7443

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8362

32 Cores64 Thrd265 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7443

24 / 48

56,743

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8362

32 / 64

56,787

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Platinum 8362: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7443

2021

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $4,226 less on MSRP ($2,010 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
✅Delivers 210.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.2 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 265W, a 65W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8362 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (56,743 vs 56,787).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8362

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 28.2 PassMark/$ ($6,236 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
❌32.5% higher power demand at 265W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8362 better than EPYC 7443?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8362 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8362 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8362 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8362 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7443 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8362 comes in 210.2% more expensive on MSRP at $6,236 MSRP versus $2,010 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7443 is also 210.0% better value on MSRP (28.2 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8362 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Platinum 8362 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7443

The EPYC 7443 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,743 points. Launch price was $2,010.

Xeon Platinum 8362

The Xeon Platinum 8362 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 265 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,787 points. Launch price was $3,500.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7443 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8362 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8362 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8362 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7443 (base: 2.85 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7443 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8362 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7443 scores 56,743 against the Xeon Platinum 8362's 56,787 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8362. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 7443	Xeon Platinum 8362
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.85 GHz+2%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+167%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	56,743	56,787

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7443 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8362 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7443) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8362) — the EPYC 7443 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7443) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8362).

Feature	EPYC 7443	Xeon Platinum 8362
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8362 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7443 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Platinum 8362 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7443	Xeon Platinum 8362
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7443 was priced at $2010, while the Xeon Platinum 8362 came in at $6236. On launch pricing ($2010 vs $6236), EPYC 7443 was $4226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7443 delivers 28.2 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8362 — making the EPYC 7443 the 102.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7443	Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP	$2010-68%	$6236
Performance per Dollar	28.2+210%	9.1
Release Date	2021	2021

Search EPYC 7443 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8362 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.