
EPYC 7551P

M4 Max (14 cores)
EPYC 7551P vs M4 Max (14 cores) Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7551P vs M4 Max (14 cores) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7551P vs M4 Max (14 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7551P
2017Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,558).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while M4 Max (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β4400% higher power demand at 180W vs 4W.
- βOlder platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while M4 Max (14 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while M4 Max (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M4 Max (14 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β Draws 4W instead of 180W, a 176W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core), while EPYC 7551P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 Max (14 cores) better than EPYC 7551P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7551P vs M4 Max (14 cores) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7551P
The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017β2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.
M4 Max (14 cores)
The M4 Max (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 November 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,558 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7551P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the M4 Max (14 cores) offers 14 cores / 14 threads β the EPYC 7551P has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (14 cores) β a 40.2% clock advantage for the M4 Max (14 cores) (base: 2 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The EPYC 7551P is built on the Naples (2017β2018) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7551P scores 38,111 against the M4 Max (14 cores)'s 38,558 β a 1.2% lead for the M4 Max (14 cores).
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | M4 Max (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+129% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.51 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.59 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | β |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017β2018) | β |
| PassMark | 38,111 | 38,558+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7551P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M4 Max (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7551P versus 8533 on the M4 Max (14 cores) β the M4 Max (14 cores) supports 220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7551P) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7551P) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) β the EPYC 7551P offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7551P) and Apple M4 (M4 Max (14 cores)).
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | M4 Max (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | 8533+220% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048+1500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 0 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Max (14 cores)). The M4 Max (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)), while the EPYC 7551P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160; M4 Max (14 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | M4 Max (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















