EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Platinum 8180

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7551P

32 / 64

38,111

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Platinum 8180

28 / 56

38,259

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Platinum 8180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Platinum 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $7,909 less on MSRP ($2,100 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Delivers 374.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.1 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 205W, a 25W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8180 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,259).

Xeon Platinum 8180

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8180 better than EPYC 7551P?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8180 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8180 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8180 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8180 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7551P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8180 comes in 376.6% more expensive on MSRP at $10,009 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7551P is also 374.8% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7551P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7551P

The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Xeon Platinum 8180

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 38,259 points. Launch price was $10,009.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7551P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7551P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551P scores 38,111 against the Xeon Platinum 8180's 38,259 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8180. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Platinum 8180
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+14%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+66%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,111	38,259

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7551P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 2666 memory speed. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7551P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7551P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180) — the EPYC 7551P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7551P) and Intel C621 (Xeon Platinum 8180).

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Platinum 8180
Socket	TR4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+167%	768 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8180). Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Platinum 8180
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7551P was priced at $2100, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 came in at $10009. On launch pricing ($2100 vs $10009), EPYC 7551P was $7909 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7551P delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8180 — making the EPYC 7551P the 130.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP	$2100-79%	$10009
Performance per Dollar	18.1+376%	3.8
Release Date	2017	2017

Search EPYC 7551P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8180 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.