EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Gold 5320

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7551P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 5320

26 Cores52 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Gold 5320 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7551P

32 / 64

38,111

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Gold 5320

26 / 52

37,558

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Gold 5320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Gold 5320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 185W, a 5W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).

Xeon Gold 5320

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($1,780 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,558 vs 38,111).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5320 better than EPYC 7551P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5320 is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7551P pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7551P also has the bigger cache pool with 64.1% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7551P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 64.1% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5320 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5320 comes in $320 cheaper on MSRP at $1,780 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7551P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 16.3% better value on MSRP (21.1 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7551P vs Xeon Gold 5320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7551P

The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Xeon Gold 5320

The Xeon Gold 5320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 39 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 37,558 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7551P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5320 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7551P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5320 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551P scores 38,111 against the Xeon Gold 5320's 37,558 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 7551P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P vs 39 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Gold 5320
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+23%	26 / 52
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+64%	39 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	38,111+1%	37,558

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7551P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5320 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7551P versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 5320 — the Xeon Gold 5320 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5320 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7551P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 5320) — the EPYC 7551P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7551P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 5320).

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Gold 5320
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	2048	6144+200%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5320). Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160; Xeon Gold 5320 rivals EPYC 7452.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Gold 5320
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7551P was priced at $2100, while the Xeon Gold 5320 came in at $1780. On launch pricing ($2100 vs $1780), Xeon Gold 5320 was $320 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7551P delivers 18.1 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5320 — making the Xeon Gold 5320 the 15% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7551P	Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP	$2100	$1780-15%
Performance per Dollar	18.1	21.1+17%
Release Date	2017	2021

Search EPYC 7551P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 5320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.