EPYC 7601
VS
Core i5-12400F

EPYC 7601 vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

EPYC 7601

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7601

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
692%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
5%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
13%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
12%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
11%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
11%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
131%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
116%
#13
EPYC 7601
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
90%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
89%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
82%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
81%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7601 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7601Core i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-12400F ($110), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($110 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7601Core i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Core i5-12400F

AMD

EPYC 7601

The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 56.9% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+433%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+256%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
35,059+79%
19,532
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the EPYC 7601 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the EPYC 7601 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i5-12400F
Socket
TR4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2666+53220%
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
2048
128 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value