
EPYC 7601

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7601
2017Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,059 vs 35,133).
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 180W, a 152W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than EPYC 7601?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7601
The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's 35,133 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+167% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+167% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 35,059 | 35,133 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 181.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) — the EPYC 7601 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370).
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | 7500+181% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048+700% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7601 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V, SVM |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













