EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7601

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌542.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 180W, a 152W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,585 vs 35,059).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 better than EPYC 7601?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7601 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7601 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7601 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7601

The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

Feature	EPYC 7601	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+167%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
PassMark	35,059+1%	34,585
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	22,246
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,865
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 200.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the EPYC 7601 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).

Feature	EPYC 7601	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Socket	TR4	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+200%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+700%	256 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+700%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7601 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.