EPYC 7601
VS
Core i9-12900F

EPYC 7601 vs Core i9-12900F

AMD

EPYC 7601

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i9-12900F

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7601

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
692%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
5%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
13%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
12%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
11%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
11%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
131%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
116%
#13
EPYC 7601
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
90%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
89%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
82%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
81%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-12900F

#178
Core i5-13500E
MSRP: $235|Avg: $235
106%
#179
Core i5-12500E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $200
105%
#180
Core i9-11900
MSRP: $439|Avg: $220
105%
#181
Core i7-12700E
MSRP: $314|Avg: $278
105%
#182
Core i3-14100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $135
105%
#183
Core i5-13400T
MSRP: $221|Avg: $200
105%
#184
Core i3-12300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
104%
#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
103%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
103%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
102%
#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
102%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
101%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
101%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
101%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
100%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
100%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
99%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
99%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
98%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
98%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
98%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
97%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
96%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
95%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
95%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
94%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
94%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7601 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7601Core i9-12900F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($370)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-12900F ($370), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($370 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7601Core i9-12900F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($370)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Core i9-12900F

AMD

EPYC 7601

The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Intel

Core i9-12900F

The Core i9-12900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,873 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i9-12900F offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900F — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-12900F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Core i9-12900F's 35,873 — a 2.3% lead for the Core i9-12900F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900F.

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i9-12900F
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+100%
16 / 24
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+113%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
35,059
35,873+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-12900F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus 4800 on the Core i9-12900F — the Core i9-12900F supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Core i9-12900F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 20 (Core i9-12900F) — the EPYC 7601 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900F).

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i9-12900F
Socket
TR4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
2666
4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity
2048+1500%
128
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Core i9-12900F rivals Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureEPYC 7601Core i9-12900F
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d