EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6737P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7713

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6737P

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Similar parts

··

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7713

64 / 128

83,018

+4.2%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6737P

32 / 64

79,634

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

✅+4.2% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
✅Draws 225W instead of 270W, a 45W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,065 less on MSRP ($4,995 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (79,634 vs 83,018).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
❌20% higher power demand at 270W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than EPYC 7713?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6737P is ahead with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713 pulls ahead with 4.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7713 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6737P comes in $2,065 cheaper on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7713 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.2% better PassMark. It is also 35.6% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7713 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 4.2% lead for the EPYC 7713. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713 vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon 6737P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	4 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+78%	144 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	83,018+4%	79,634
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the EPYC 7713 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon 6737P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon 6737P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713 was priced at $7060, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($7060 vs $4995), Xeon 6737P was $2065 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Xeon 6737P the 30.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon 6737P
MSRP	$7060	$4995-29%
Performance per Dollar	11.8	15.9+35%
Release Date	2021	2025

Search EPYC 7713 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6737P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.