EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 7713

AMD

EPYC 7J13

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7713

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 7713 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 7713 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 7713: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7J13

2021

Why buy it

  • +2.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
  • 24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $830 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Delivers 9.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
  • Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 84,786).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7713 better than EPYC 7J13?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7713 is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7J13 pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7J13 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7713 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7713 comes in $830 cheaper on MSRP at $7,060 MSRP versus $7,890 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7J13 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.1% better PassMark. It is also 9.4% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7J13 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7J13 vs EPYC 7713 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7J13

The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.

AMD

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7J13 and EPYC 7713 share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 — a 5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7713 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture using a 7 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7J13 scores 84,786 against the EPYC 7713's 83,018 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7J13. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7J13EPYC 7713
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
64 / 128
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.68 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.55 GHz+27%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
84,786+2%
83,018
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7J13) and SP3 (EPYC 7713).

FeatureEPYC 7J13EPYC 7713
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 7J13EPYC 7713
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7J13 was priced at $7890, while the EPYC 7713 came in at $7060. On launch pricing ($7890 vs $7060), EPYC 7713 was $830 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7J13 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7713 — making the EPYC 7713 the 9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7J13EPYC 7713
MSRP
$7890
$7060-11%
Performance per Dollar
10.7
11.8+10%
Release Date
2021
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.