EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8470

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7713

64 / 128

83,018

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon Platinum 8470

52 / 104

89,850

+8.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713

2021

Why buy it

✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 105 MB).
✅Costs $2,299 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
✅Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8470 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 89,850).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8470 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8470

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
❌55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8470 better than EPYC 7713?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8470 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8470 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.2% better PassMark, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8470 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7713 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8470 comes in 32.6% more expensive on MSRP at $9,359 MSRP versus $7,060 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7713 is also 22.5% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 64/128. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713

The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

Xeon Platinum 8470

The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the EPYC 7713 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8470 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 7.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8470. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713 vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8470
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+23%	52 / 104
Boost Clock	3.68 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+144%	105 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	83,018	89,850+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — the Xeon Platinum 8470 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7713 supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the EPYC 7713 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8470
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 TB+102300%	4 TB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8470
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	—	Cloud Infrastructure

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713 was priced at $7060, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 came in at $9359. On launch pricing ($7060 vs $9359), EPYC 7713 was $2299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the EPYC 7713 the 20.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7713	Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP	$7060-25%	$9359
Performance per Dollar	11.8+23%	9.6
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7713 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8470 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.