
EPYC 7713

Xeon 6780E
EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6780E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6780E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6780E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7713
2021Why buy it
- ✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅Costs $4,290 less on MSRP ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,060 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 330W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,018 vs 86,734).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+4.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,060 MSRP).
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7713 better than Xeon 6780E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7713 vs Xeon 6780E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713
The EPYC 7713 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,018 points. Launch price was $7,060.

Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7713 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 20.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 7713 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7713 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713 scores 83,018 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 4.4% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713 vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | EPYC 7713 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 144 / 144+125% |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+137% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 83,018 | 86,734+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7713 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the Xeon 6780E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7713 supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the EPYC 7713 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7713 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 TB+102300% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 7713 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | EPYC 7713 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7713 was priced at $7060, while the Xeon 6780E came in at $11350. On launch pricing ($7060 vs $11350), EPYC 7713 was $4290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the EPYC 7713 the 42.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7713 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7060-38% | $11350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8+55% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















