
EPYC 7742

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7742
2019Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 60 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,448 vs 73,387).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,224 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (60 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6548Y+ better than EPYC 7742?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7742
The EPYC 7742 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,448 points. Launch price was $6,950.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7742 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7742 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7742 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7742 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7742 scores 69,448 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 5.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7742 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 2.5 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+327% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 69,448 | 73,387+6% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7742 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7742 versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7742) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the EPYC 7742 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7742) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7742 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7742 was priced at $6950, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ came in at $3726. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $3726), Xeon Gold 6548Y+ was $3224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7742 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ the 65.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $3726-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 19.7+97% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















