EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7742

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7742

64 / 128

69,448

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 / 104

68,385

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7742

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8571N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,351 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1042.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (68,385 vs 69,448).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than EPYC 7742?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8571N is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7742 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7742 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8571N comes in $6,351 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $6,950 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7742 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 1042.5% better value on MSRP (114.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7742 vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7742

The EPYC 7742 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,448 points. Launch price was $6,950.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7742 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the EPYC 7742 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7742 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7742 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7742 scores 69,448 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 7742. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7742 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	EPYC 7742	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+23%	52 / 104
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	2.4 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	69,448+2%	68,385
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	60,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7742 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7742 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7742) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the EPYC 7742 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7742) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	EPYC 7742	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7742 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 7742	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7742 was priced at $6950, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $6351 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7742 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 167.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7742	Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP	$6950	$599-91%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	114.2+1042%
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7742 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8571N on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.