EPYC 7742
Xeon w7-3565X
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon w7-3565X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon w7-3565X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon w7-3565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7742
2019Why buy it
- ✅+210.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 83 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 335W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,448 vs 70,982).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3565X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-3565X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,261 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 164.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌48.9% higher power demand at 335W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3565X better than EPYC 7742?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7742 vs Xeon w7-3565X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7742
The EPYC 7742 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,448 points. Launch price was $6,950.
Xeon w7-3565X
The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7742 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w7-3565X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7742 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7742 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7742 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7742 scores 69,448 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3565X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7742 vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+41% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 2.5 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+210% | 82.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 69,448 | 70,982+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,812 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7742 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7742 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X — the Xeon w7-3565X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7742) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the EPYC 7742 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7742) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3565X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7742) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7742 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7742 was priced at $6950, while the Xeon w7-3565X came in at $2689. On launch pricing ($6950 vs $2689), Xeon w7-3565X was $4261 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7742 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 90.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7742 | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6950 | $2689-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 26.4+164% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7742 and Xeon w7-3565X
