EPYC 8434P vs EPYC 9175F

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8434P

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8434P vs EPYC 9175F Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8434P

48 / 96

66,490

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8434P vs EPYC 9175F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8434P vs EPYC 9175F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $2,739 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 183.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.8 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 66,490).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8434P better than EPYC 9175F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9175F is ahead with a 28.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8434P pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. EPYC 9175F also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8434P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8434P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8434P comes in $2,739 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $4,256 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9175F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 183.1% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8434P vs EPYC 9175F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9175F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 46.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	EPYC 9175F
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+200%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	5 GHz+61%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.2 GHz+68%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	512 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	66,490	65,894

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).

Feature	EPYC 8434P	EPYC 9175F
Socket	SP6	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	1152	4096+256%
RAM Channels	6	12+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	EPYC 9175F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8434P was priced at $1517, while the EPYC 9175F came in at $4256. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $4256), EPYC 8434P was $2739 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the EPYC 8434P the 95.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	EPYC 9175F
MSRP	$1517-64%	$4256
Performance per Dollar	43.8+183%	15.5
Release Date	2023	2024

Search EPYC 8434P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.