CPU
GPU
EPYC 8434P
EPYC 9175F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8434P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3,137) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+19%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3,137) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and EPYC 9175F
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9175F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 46.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+200% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5 GHz+61% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 66,490 | 65,894 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 12+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the EPYC 9175F debuted at $4256. At current prices ($3137 vs $3703), the EPYC 8434P is $566 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 21.2 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the EPYC 8434P the 17.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-64% | $4256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3137-15% | $3703 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.2+19% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8434P and EPYC 9175F
