EPYC 8434P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
EPYC 8434P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8434P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8434P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8434P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $882 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.8 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 66,614).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 8434P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8434P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+100% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 66,490 | 66,614 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 45,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 8434P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB | 2048 GB+78% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8434P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8434P was priced at $1517, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $2399), EPYC 8434P was $882 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the EPYC 8434P the 44.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-37% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.8+58% | 27.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8434P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
