EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8434P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8434P

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8434P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7573X

32 / 64

69,432

+4.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 8434P

48 / 96

66,490

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8434P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8434P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,073 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Delivers 252.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.8 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (66,490 vs 69,432).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7573X better than EPYC 8434P?

Yes. EPYC 7573X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7573X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7573X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8434P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7573X comes in 268.5% more expensive on MSRP at $5,590 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8434P is also 252.9% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8434P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 8434P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 8434P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P — a 14.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 8434P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 8434P's 66,490 — a 4.3% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 8434P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+500%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	69,432+4%	66,490

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8434P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus 4800 on the EPYC 8434P — the EPYC 8434P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7573X) vs 6 (EPYC 8434P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7573X) vs 96 (EPYC 8434P) — the EPYC 7573X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP6 (EPYC 8434P).

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 8434P
Socket	SP3	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096+256%	1152
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8434P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 8434P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the EPYC 8434P came in at $1517. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $1517), EPYC 8434P was $4073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 8434P — making the EPYC 8434P the 111.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 8434P
MSRP	$5590	$1517-73%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	43.8+253%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 7573X on Amazon

Search EPYC 8434P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.