EPYC 7573X vs Xeon w7-3565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3565X

32 Cores64 Thrd335 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon w7-3565X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7573X

32 / 64

69,432

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3565X

32 / 64

70,982

+2.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon w7-3565X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon w7-3565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

✅+830.9% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Draws 280W instead of 335W, a 55W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 70,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3565X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3565X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,901 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 768 MB).
❌19.6% higher power demand at 335W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3565X better than EPYC 7573X?

Yes. Xeon w7-3565X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3565X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3565X is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3565X is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3565X comes in $2,901 cheaper on MSRP at $2,689 MSRP versus $5,590 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 112.5% better value on MSRP (26.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3565X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7573X vs Xeon w7-3565X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

Xeon w7-3565X

The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7573X and Xeon w7-3565X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3565X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon w7-3565X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+831%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	69,432	70,982+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,812

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X — the Xeon w7-3565X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7573X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the EPYC 7573X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon w7-3565X
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3565X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon w7-3565X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the Xeon w7-3565X came in at $2689. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $2689), Xeon w7-3565X was $2901 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 72% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP	$5590	$2689-52%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	26.4+113%
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 7573X on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3565X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.