EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7573X

32 / 64

69,432

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 7702

64 / 128

69,060

0.0%

Ryzen 9 3950X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

EPYC 7702

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7573X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (69,060 vs 69,432).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7573X better than EPYC 7702?

Yes. EPYC 7573X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7573X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7573X is the better buy right now. EPYC 7573X comes in $860 cheaper on MSRP at $5,590 MSRP versus $6,450 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7573X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7573X vs EPYC 7702 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

EPYC 7702

The EPYC 7702 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,060 points. Launch price was $6,450.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7702 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7573X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7702 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the EPYC 7702's 69,060 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 7702
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	64 / 128+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+7%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+200%	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	69,432	69,060

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7702 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and SP3 (EPYC 7702).

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 7702
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; EPYC 7702 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 7702
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7573X was priced at $5590, while the EPYC 7702 came in at $6450. On launch pricing ($5590 vs $6450), EPYC 7573X was $860 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702 — making the EPYC 7573X the 14.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7573X	EPYC 7702
MSRP	$5590-13%	$6450
Performance per Dollar	12.4+16%	10.7
Release Date	2022	2019

Search EPYC 7573X on Amazon

Search EPYC 7702 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.